Climate change has emerged as one of the most urgent challenges of the twenty-first century, significantly impacting ecosystems, human communities, and global development. In sub-Saharan Africa, climate-induced resource scarcity is intensifying competition for land and water, fueling conflicts between farming and pastoral communities, and exacerbating existing grievances. This article argues that the resource-conflict nexus in Africa is not an inevitable outcome of climate change but a product of governance failures, historical marginalization, and the neglect of indigenous knowledge systems. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, multicase study design, drawing on a systematic review and thematic synthesis of peerreviewed literature, policy documents, and documented community-based initiatives from the Lake Chad Basin, the Sahel, Nigeria, Senegal, Tivland in Benue State, the Ankole sub-region of Uganda, and Kenya. The analysis maps Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge (ITEK) practices onto climate adaptation and conflictmitigation outcomes, while a comparative policy analysis examines the extent to which national adaptation frameworks integrate ITEK within legal and institutional structures. Considering the empirical evidence from the Lake Chad Basin, the Sahel, Nigeria, and Senegal, it demonstrates how ITEK, including crop rotation, intercropping, sacred sites, seasonal farming calendars, land tenure systems, and communal ownership of resources, offers culturally appropriate, place-based solutions for climate adaptation and conflict mitigation. The article critically examines the marginalization of indigenous knowledge in formal climate governance, noting that despite being acknowledged as a valuable resource for climate adaptation, current national adaptation policies on the African continent still show serious gaps in effectively integrating ITEK systems within legal frameworks to reduce vulnerability. It highlights promising initiatives such as Kenya's Nganyi Indigenous Weather Knowledge Project, which co-produces hybrid forecasts combining indigenous indicators and meteorological data, and community-based resource management in the Lake Chad Basin. The article concludes with concrete implications for policymakers, scholars, and practitioners, emphasizing the need for epistemic justice, positioning indigenous knowledge as co-equal to scientific knowledge in climate adaptation, and integrating local communities in the design and implementation of climate policies. Furthermore, this research makes significant contributions to the ongoing Conference of the Parties (COP) programmes by providing empirical evidence and actionable recommendations for advancing the integration of Indigenous Knowledge Systems within global climate governance frameworks, particularly in relation to Article 7 of the Paris Agreement, the Global Goal on Adaptation, the Loss and Damage agenda, and the Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform.
Keywords: climate change, resource conflict, indigenous knowledge, farmer-herder conflict, traditional ecological knowledge,