PHILOSOPHY AND PRAXIS

The harm principle, proposed by John Stuart Mill in On Liberty, states that individuals should be free to act as they choose, as long as their actions do not harm others. However, its application in the context of HIV/AIDS in the social and behavioural sciences has been criticized for several reasons. Firstly, the concept of harm can be subjective, leading to different interpretations of the harm principle. Secondly, the principle fails to take into account the impact of power dynamics, privilege and marginalization, which can contribute to the spread of HIV/AIDS. Furthermore, the principle does not account for the collective harm caused by societal attitudes and discrimination towards individuals living with HIV/AIDS, leading to a lack of attention to the broader social determinants of the epidemic. In the end, the paper concludes that while the harm principle is a valuable ethical framework, its application in the context of HIV/AIDS in the social and behavioural sciences requires careful consideration and a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved.

Open Full Text (PDF)